Snow.. it wouldn't be the first time someone had an alias.

signed shoppegirl, indianprincess, dramaQueen, sg, vicky, vivian, ..  etc.......................

Hey 37, are you using two different ID's? The post from the doctor from you and Good Lord look like the same person. Hmmm, I think we have some fakes amongst us. Or are you working for KX? Just wondering.

Actually he was working on nukes, the evidence was quite clear. Tons of yellow cake uranium was airlifted to Canada from Iraq.

http://newsbusters.org/forums/topic-discussion/invasion-iraq-still-right-thing-do-18691

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/06/world/fg-cake6

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=f65c5538-bb56-45eb-9f0d-4b6d28d90d01

You can post the facts to Rugby all day and he will ignore it. Libs build a cacoon around themselves to protect what they want to believe. They won't let anything in that challanges those beliefs even when they are clearly wrong. In this case the facts clearly show that he is wrong. You cannot even dispute the fact that he is wrong. The problem is that he would rather live in his own little world protected from rality and the facts.

Rugby go back and learn your history. Clinton and his admin had claimed that Iraq had WMD's and the like.

Furthermore, Saddam was giving 25 thousand to suicide bombers families.

Also they had stockpiles of chemical weapons. That have been used in IED's against our troops. BTW thos stockpiles violated the law, and constitute WMD's. Which some of you have so hard a time of understanding.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918

("These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.

The Chemical Weapons Convention is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. It was signed in 1993 and entered into force in 1997.)

What part of that is unclear?

Maybe when you say WMD, you only think nuclear weapons, because then you are right. There were no nuclear weapons in Iraq. There were however WMD's.

It is a fact that Iraq's Hussein had WMD. Every news agency out there has confirmed this (even the far left fictional 60 minutes). To say that Iraq's Saddam didn't is a wilfull lie about our troops and nothing less than slander.

All the dems thought he did too.

And there were weapons, we gave them 18 MONTHS to move the WMD;s and they did. 

Nolie. 

    It began with lies like this:

    "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."

    - Dick Cheney, Vice President Speech to VFW National Convention 8/26/2002

    ... and this:

    "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

    - Condoleezza Rice, US National Security Adviser CNN Late Edition 9/8/2002

    ... and this:

    "We know for a fact that there are weapons there."

    - Ari Fleischer, Press Secretary Press Briefing 1/9/2003

    ... and this:

    "We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more."

    - Colin Powell, Secretary of State Remarks to the UN Security Council 2/5/2003

    ... and this:

    "We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."

    - Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense ABC Interview 3/30/2003

    It began with George W. Bush standing before both houses of Congress and an international television audience for his January 2003 State of the Union address and stating that Iraq was in possession of 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons - which is one million pounds - of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent, 30,000 missiles to deliver the stuff, mobile biological weapons labs, al-Qaeda connections and uranium from Niger for use in a robust nuclear weapons program.

    Lies. All lies. 4,321 American soldiers have died in Iraq because of those lies, 101 during this year.

None of our soldier died in vain.  sorry to burst your HateBush bubble...

THANKS TO OUR TROOPS AND GOD BLESS THEM FOR THEIR SACRIFICE.

No, AQ and Saddam did not support each other.  AQ's extreme Islamic ideas represented a threat to Saddam's mostly secular (or at least non-Islamic) dictatorship.  The Weakly Standard's claims are false and have been refuted.

The Americans killed in Bush's (now Obama's) Iraq debacle have died for nothing.  What shame...

Peace and Semper Fidelis...

"The point about the debt.... is if you have a tax cut you should also follow that with decreased spending instead of just continuing like you have the same amount of money. Also just think how much we need to be taxed to makeup the differnce between our budget and what we take in from taxes."

What throws a wrench into this line of thought is that even though we may cut taxes, our federal govt. continues to borrow money (from China and India for instance) and/or take money from areas like SSI and medicare.  To make the system work right, if we had a tax cut, it should be followed by a reduction in spending like cutting bloated programs or discontinuing outdated programs.