Actually he was working on nukes, the evidence was quite clear. Tons of yellow cake uranium was airlifted to Canada from Iraq.

http://newsbusters.org/forums/topic-discussion/invasion-iraq-still-right-thing-do-18691

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/06/world/fg-cake6

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=f65c5538-bb56-45eb-9f0d-4b6d28d90d01

You can post the facts to Rugby all day and he will ignore it. Libs build a cacoon around themselves to protect what they want to believe. They won't let anything in that challanges those beliefs even when they are clearly wrong. In this case the facts clearly show that he is wrong. You cannot even dispute the fact that he is wrong. The problem is that he would rather live in his own little world protected from rality and the facts.

Rugby go back and learn your history. Clinton and his admin had claimed that Iraq had WMD's and the like.

Furthermore, Saddam was giving 25 thousand to suicide bombers families.

Also they had stockpiles of chemical weapons. That have been used in IED's against our troops. BTW thos stockpiles violated the law, and constitute WMD's. Which some of you have so hard a time of understanding.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918

("These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.

The Chemical Weapons Convention is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. It was signed in 1993 and entered into force in 1997.)

What part of that is unclear?

Maybe when you say WMD, you only think nuclear weapons, because then you are right. There were no nuclear weapons in Iraq. There were however WMD's.

It is a fact that Iraq's Hussein had WMD. Every news agency out there has confirmed this (even the far left fictional 60 minutes). To say that Iraq's Saddam didn't is a wilfull lie about our troops and nothing less than slander.

All the dems thought he did too.

And there were weapons, we gave them 18 MONTHS to move the WMD;s and they did. 

Nolie. 

    It began with lies like this:

    "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."

    - Dick Cheney, Vice President Speech to VFW National Convention 8/26/2002

    ... and this:

    "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

    - Condoleezza Rice, US National Security Adviser CNN Late Edition 9/8/2002

    ... and this:

    "We know for a fact that there are weapons there."

    - Ari Fleischer, Press Secretary Press Briefing 1/9/2003

    ... and this:

    "We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more."

    - Colin Powell, Secretary of State Remarks to the UN Security Council 2/5/2003

    ... and this:

    "We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."

    - Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense ABC Interview 3/30/2003

    It began with George W. Bush standing before both houses of Congress and an international television audience for his January 2003 State of the Union address and stating that Iraq was in possession of 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons - which is one million pounds - of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent, 30,000 missiles to deliver the stuff, mobile biological weapons labs, al-Qaeda connections and uranium from Niger for use in a robust nuclear weapons program.

    Lies. All lies. 4,321 American soldiers have died in Iraq because of those lies, 101 during this year.

None of our soldier died in vain.  sorry to burst your HateBush bubble...

THANKS TO OUR TROOPS AND GOD BLESS THEM FOR THEIR SACRIFICE.

No, AQ and Saddam did not support each other.  AQ's extreme Islamic ideas represented a threat to Saddam's mostly secular (or at least non-Islamic) dictatorship.  The Weakly Standard's claims are false and have been refuted.

The Americans killed in Bush's (now Obama's) Iraq debacle have died for nothing.  What shame...

Peace and Semper Fidelis...

‘Iraq posed no credible threat to the United States.’

Iraq’s Hussein funded Al-Quada and hosted their training camps. They killed a lot of people on 9/11.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/003/033jgqyi.asp

http://www.nysun.com/foreign/saddam-al-qaeda-did-collaborate-documents-show/29746/

http://www.nysun.com/foreign/saddam-al-qaeda-did-collaborate-documents-show/29746/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/aug/23/alqaida.iraq

We have never had a draft, men thought this was worthwhile that they signed up to go over there. Per Rugby, this was a cause truly worth fighting for.

“If a cause is truly worth fighting for, people will join."

Hats off to our troops for a job well done in doing their just, legal, moral, and worthwhile mission!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S. Other than WWII, Korea, and Iraq can anyone find another instance in history where a nation invaded another nation and then turned that nation over to the freely elected government of that nation? Can anyone come up with a country other than the United States that has done this?

I am not saying that other such events have never happened, I am just a history buff and can’t think of any.

Iraq posed no credible threat to the United States.

Darn!  You mean we gave it all back?  I thought the dems told everyone we "took" the countries.    :)

They need to be happy,  they are now in control of their own lives and safety.  I hope they can do it, and I think they will.

They should celebrate,   we celebrated our  independence.

"All of us are happy - Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds on this day," Waleed al-Bahadili said as he celebrated at the park. "The Americans harmed and insulted us too much."

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki declared a public holiday and proclaimed June 30 as "National Sovereignty Day."