"Too bad you wing nuts couldn't find a Republican candidate with "family values" and got beat by a black socialist  liberal Muslim unexperienced noncitizen.    What can a patriotic "true American" do?  "

Move to Texas.  

Reply...

this whole thing makes me sick. men and women whining about how everything is unfair. honestly. i agree with the men that women take advantage of child support and that laws need to be changed. i don't agree at the outrageous amounts that non-custodial parents have to pay.  my mother got 770 a month from my father for 3 kids and like most women, she took advantage of it and paid for her rent and bills but when it came to feeding and clothing her children, we got crapped on sharing clothes and bologna sandwiches and ramen. and she worked full time. women today are getting things for them selves with the money and not taking care of the children. i am a single mother with a wonderful autistic son who recieves no child support and no welfare and not on any government programs. i work fulltime in retail but i make enough to get by and buy everything that my son needs. my son's father on the other hand thankfully comes and visits his son quite often but also has 3 other children who their mothers are withholding visitations against court orders. he makes 800 a month and is supposed to pay 1200 a month for the 3 of them. i have listened on the phone to his workers cuss him out and tell him that he is a deadbeat dad because he doesn't have three jobs to make his full payment, and they have missed notifying him of reviews to get them lowered. also denying dna testing is pathetic. the child support agencies shouldn't be a state to state thing, i belive that the states should have to answer to a federal agency and a national guidelines should be set. the amount per child should be based by age of the child and how many children there are. if each state had to answer to someone above them and a figure of how much it takes to care for a child of a certain age was cut in half and set to a payment guildline. i think things would be much better for all involved. i also believe that child support payments should be put on a type of child support card so that when the child support was recieved, the custodial parent would have to spend it on the childs needs and so that child support could moniter that the money was actually spent on the child and not am the custodial parents wants. i say this because my mother and a few of my friends mothers made us borrow from our child support and pay it back because it was their money, not ours. many people may not agree, but i think that it may be a way to restrict some of the ways that the custodial parents take advantage of their kids. also if i can raise my autistic son without the financial help, i think many others can do that also or maybe i'm just lucky to be able to do so. and no my family is not around me so they don't provide daycare, i pay just like others do. Reply...

No where in the Bible does Jesus preach about or approve of torture. Reply...

Joe - you forgot to add closet homosexual to your list. 

Reply...

CALIFORNIA TAXPAYER PROTECTION ACT
Sponsored by Taxpayer Revolution

PLEASE MAIL PETITIONS TO: POB 9985 SAN DIEGO, CA 92169

Petitions from Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties can be mailed to: Taxpayer Revolution, 6 Gumwood, Irvine, CA 92612

RULES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SIGNING PETITIONS:

Only a registered voter can sign as registered with their street address, NO POB. Zip codes must be used. All voters on one petition must be from the same county. Signatures can be gathered at home improvement, grocery or other stores. Gun shows will be publicized later. You can request petitions to be mailed by emailing from "contact us" on the main menu.

The Initiative’s Laws Will:

• STOP 18 years of WELFARE payments to illegal aliens with U.S. born children.


• REQUIRE all those who are not citizens or permanent legal residents to submit ID documents, provided to Homeland Security, before receiving a birth certificate.


• ALLOW only CITIZENS AND PERMANENT LEGAL RESIDENTS eligibility for all public benefits including non-emergency and pre-natal care.


• ALLOWS Homeland Security to review approved applications for federal, state or local benefits that illegal aliens are permitted to receive due to a U.S. born child. (Please see the initiative summary.)


• 
  

  An article in the Sacramento Bee on September 10, 2007 by Washington correspondent David Whitney summed up automatic citizenship: "Although Congress has never passed a law saying so, no president has ever ordered it, and no court has ever ruled on the issue, each of these babies automatically becomes a U.S. citizen when it takes its first breath." This is a taxpayer injustice.

  
  

  Our citizen’s movement will launch the national debate we need to bring an END to "birth tourism" and AUTOMATIC CITIZENSHIP in the United States of America. The movement will uphold the recorded words and real intent of the authors of our Constitution. To the authors and the states which passed the 14th Amendment "subject to the jurisdiction" is to mean that citizens are born to parents who are "NOT subjects of a foreign power." The 14th Amendment is meant to confer citizenship on children whose parents are under the exclusive power, protection and obedience of the United States.

  
  The goal to stop automatic citizenship is critical toward reducing the crime problem. A major reason deported criminal illegal aliens return immediately to the United States after deportation is because they have left behind children born here. Former Homeland Security Director, Michael Chertoff, reported there are two million criminal illegal aliens.


• There will never be "BORDER SECURITY" without ending automatic citizenship. Birth tourism is stealing billions from the United States taxpayers.

Please DONATE by credit card on-line now at "Contribute" or "Donate" to help make this critically important political movement a success.

The initiative petitions will be circulating in 2009 to qualify for the JUNE 2010 ballot and can be downloaded at this site. Please volunteer to obtain signatures.

PLEASE DONATE NOW AND MAIL YOUR CHECK TO:

TAXPAYER REVOLUTION
c/o Treasurer
P.O. BOX 9985
SAN DIEGO, CA 92169
State Committee ID no. 1297837

Reply...

Well OK,
You can say truthfully, that Saddam supported terrorism. Several articles indicate that the sent money to finance terrorist training camps...
BLMccAR would have you believe that those camps were in Iraq...prevailing opinion has it that those camps were NOT in Iraq..
Even if those used bio weapons were classified as WMDs, as you note, they're not what the administration meant during it's campaign for the run up to the invasion..I grant that your'e correct there.
At the bottom line,
1. Iraq, prior to the invasion, was rather benign, being run by a bellicose madman
2. While it was not a threat to the USA, Saddam was his own worst enemy, and Cheney's office of special projects took full advantage of that, to make him look like an OGRE...
(as if  OGRE season was open at the time.) and if it was, why didn't we push it at Tora Bora, or rein in Bashir...(Blackhawk Down)
SO...it's not difficult to reach the conclusion that
Bush wanted to pick it up where his dad left off
Bush was after embellishing his legacy, as he'd never succeeded in anything at any time during his life
(I Hope you say the movie W)
Cheney was, and remains a madman
Rummy too, but in an entirely different way. Rummy actually thought history would paint him as a kindly old man...
Bush and Cheney were a "perfect storm" and Rove put it all together
It's an interesting piece of American history, if America survives it..
but hopefully, despite S.G, Jack, Blmccar and others, it will.
It'll take some time, but common decency of America will prevail, after we get rid of the detritus left by the previous administration...many of whom continue to post right here.
We're still circling the drain, but the stopper has been put in place... Reply...

A deputy sheriff on another board said his department was just hit with a 74% reduction in funding.   The sheriff is worried he can't provide protection to the citizens.   

I sense we may see riots coming soon to California.

 

Reply...

No I am not grasping at straws I am ust saying you cannot say that there were not WMD's there, just like you can't say there weren't terrorists. There just wasn't the WMD's and terrorists we were after. Reply...

I did read most of what you posted....but.....I didn't stop there..
Thus I conclude that though they classified those remanants as WMD,s
You're still grasping at straws..
As far as Who KNows is concerned,
He made an absolutely incoherent statement...but that's typical of someone like him, who'se IQ doesn't reach room temperature..
Clinton attacked Saddam over WMDs..
How irrelevant can you get little man?
Nobody denies that he had bio weapns in the 80s, and used them too..so what's your point?
Propaganda?
Cheney had an entire government department dedicated to propaganda supporting his insane desire for war...
and people like you still cling to his lies...
Google Office of Special projects..
It won't de program you...nothing can do that....but you might learn something...though I doubt it. Reply...

Well maybe you should educate yourself on CWC then. It constitutes WMD's, just not the ones we went for. Did you read the OPCW report from this year that I posted? 

 

Reply...

Joe, Ye of little Faith...
Enjoy the week end....

Wave that flag
Wave it wide and high
Summertime done
Come and gone
My oh my


Guess where that came from Reply...

There was quite a stink raised when they found remanents of weapons, produced in the early 80s, containing traces of sarin and mustard gas, and got a Colonel (Chu) to say that these qualified as weapons of mass destruction, despite the fact that they were no longer effective...
but it's hard to believe that you'd base your claim that Saddam had wmds on this...
However, it's consistant with a claim made by someone who just cannot give up that claim...for reasons I've mentioned before... Reply...

http://smallwarsjournal.com/documents/ngicwmdreport.pdf

http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20090427_8248.php

"Iraq submitted its initial declaration on 12 March 2009, and has declared two bunkers with filled and unfilled chemical weapons munitions, some precursors, as well as five former chemical weapons production facilities,"

 

Reply...

So the DoD is lying? I never claimed AQ either, but there were terrorists inside Iraq, pal. Abu Ibrahim, he attacked a Pan-AM flight, his real name is Husayn al-Umari

http://www.cleveland.com/world/index.ssf/2009/04/finding_frankenstein_terrorist.html

Claiming Iraq had no terrorists pre-war is like saying, you have a million dollars simply because you say so.

I will rank you in with the rank in file 9/11 truthers then Rye, if you are sitting here telling me that the DoD is making up that they found chemical munitions.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/22/AR2006062201839.html

Which is basically a rehash of the first story which is directly from the DoD. They are covered under the Chemical Weapons Convention. While they themselves may have posed no threat to us there. They are still Chemical Weapons that are banned by the CWC. Which makes them WMD's 

Reply...

Banks have declared that they will honor them..for a certain time..but the interest is going to cost California millions.. Reply...